A full rebuild of structure and design
A new site built around the firm's current services and client focus, not a light edit of the old one.
Service
An accounting firm website needs a redesign when it is actively costing the firm business: it looks dated enough to raise doubt, it loads slowly on a phone, it cannot be updated without calling a developer, or it simply does not say what the firm actually does anymore. A redesign is a deliberate rebuild of the site's design and structure that preserves what already works, mainly URLs and existing search rankings, while replacing everything that does not.
Fit
A redesign fits a firm whose site no longer describes the practice it has become. The usual trigger is structural: services added over the years that were never given their own pages, an about page naming people who have left, or a site that needs an outside contractor every time a phone number changes. A firm whose content is accurate and only looks dated is often better served by a smaller update.
The signs worth acting on are usually visible without any technical analysis: the site looks visibly older than the firm's current brand, it is slow enough on a phone that a visitor notices the wait, updating a single line of text requires calling someone, or the services listed no longer match what the firm actually offers. Any one of these alone might be tolerable; two or three together usually mean the site is quietly working against new business rather than for it, and the cost of that is invisible because a lost visitor never explains why they left.

What gets preserved through a redesign is anything the old site already earned: existing page URLs, the search rankings tied to them, and any content that is genuinely accurate and worth keeping. A redesign done carelessly changes URLs without redirects and quietly resets years of accumulated search visibility, which is the single most common way a redesign backfires. A redesign done correctly maps every old URL to its new equivalent before launch, so a search engine and a returning visitor both land on a working page instead of an error.
What gets rebuilt instead of carried forward is usually the site's structure, its visual design, and any content that was written for a version of the firm that no longer exists. A firm that has added services, dropped others, or shifted its client focus since the old site launched needs its service pages rebuilt around the current reality, not lightly edited copies of outdated ones. The visual design gets rebuilt too, since a redesign that only changes colors while keeping the old structure rarely fixes the underlying problem that prompted the redesign in the first place.
The migration happens as a mapped, tested handoff: every URL on the old site gets a documented redirect to its equivalent on the new one, the new site is built and reviewed before the switch, and the domain points to the new site only once that mapping is confirmed complete. This sequencing keeps the site online throughout and avoids the gap where an old page disappears before its replacement is ready, which is when both visitors and search rankings take the hit that a redesign is supposed to avoid. Nothing about this sequence is rushed, since a missed step here is expensive to undo later.
Deliverables
A new site built around the firm's current services and client focus, not a light edit of the old one.
Every existing page mapped to its new equivalent so rankings and bookmarked links keep working after launch.
A review of what to keep, what to cut, and what no longer matches the firm's actual services.
Content rebuilt around current services and industries, not carried forward from an outdated version of the firm.
The new site goes live only once the redirect map is tested, so the switch happens without an outage.
Correct redirects mean existing search visibility carries into the new site instead of resetting to zero.
Scope
The second list is the one that saves everybody a difficult call in week three.
IN Included in this service
OUT Not included
Timing
The old site stays live for the whole project and the new one is only pointed at the domain when the redirect map has been tested. The launch window is the same as a fresh build: 7 days on Intake, 10 on Reconciliation and 15 on Filed.
Cost
A redesign carries the same figures as a new build, starting at $137 a month with a $797 one-time build fee invoiced after launch. The size of the existing site does not change those figures, but it does change which launch window is realistic and how much of the first month goes into the audit.
| Factor | What it changes |
|---|---|
| Number of existing URLs | Every live URL needs a mapped destination, so a site with years of pages takes longer to audit and map than a small one. |
| How much content survives the audit | Accurate content carries forward quickly, while pages describing work the firm no longer does have to be replaced rather than moved. |
| Whether the old site can be exported | A platform that lets its content be read and exported keeps the audit short, while a locked platform means rebuilding content by hand. |
| Which tier the rebuilt site runs on | The AI Engine sits on Reconciliation and up and the Content Engine on Filed, which is the choice that sets the monthly figure. |
| How much changes after the rebuild | Each month includes 5 revisions, and a firm still settling its service list spends those on structure instead of on detail. |
What firms report
We reviewed the draft on phones rather than a big screen, deliberately. Key information comes first and the contact option is clearly labeled. It is far more practical than the old page when we share it with a caller.
Got Mobile navigation and page layout for outsourced finance support
The old outsourced finance support PDF made sense on a printer and nowhere else. Each section has its own link, so answering a question no longer means attaching the whole file. The print-friendly version remains, but it is no longer the only option.
Got Structured reference pages for outsourced finance support
Case studies
Real engagements, anonymized by business type and region. Each one covers the starting point, what was built and what changed.
It will not, as long as the redesign includes a documented redirect from every old URL to its new equivalent. The rankings a page has already earned are attached to that page continuing to exist somewhere; the redirect is what carries that value into the new site instead of resetting it.
A smaller update fits when the content is accurate but the visuals feel dated. A full redesign fits when the structure itself no longer matches the firm's current services, the site is slow, or making basic changes requires outside help every time.
No. The new site is built and reviewed first, and the domain only points to it once the redirect mapping is tested and confirmed, so there is no gap where the old site is down and the new one is not ready.
Only the content that no longer reflects the firm gets replaced. Anything accurate and worth keeping carries forward, and the redesign is a chance to rebuild what is outdated rather than a wholesale discard of everything that already exists on the current site.
Timelines depend on the plan and how much of the existing site needs to be audited and rebuilt. The launch schedule for each plan is on the pricing page, and the redirect mapping is completed before that launch date, not after.
By what the page does today, not by how long it has existed. A page that still describes a service the firm sells gets rebuilt, a page that attracts visits but describes retired work gets replaced at the same URL, and a page that does neither is retired with a redirect to the nearest relevant page.
Yes. The existing site stays live and editable by whoever maintains it until the day the domain switches, so nothing has to be frozen. Anything published during the project is included in the redirect map before cutover rather than being missed.
No. A redesign keeps the firm on the same domain, which is what lets the redirect map carry the existing search value forward. A domain change is a separate decision, and it is one worth avoiding unless the firm is genuinely rebranding.
Adjacent
Weighing this against a builder, a freelancer or an agency? There are 10 comparison pages, and each one says where the other option wins. See the comparisons
Filed
A live walk-through of the site you would get, in about 30 minutes. Plans from $137 a month, the $797 build fee invoiced only after launch.
LedgerWebStudio uses the cookies below. Necessary cookies keep the site working and cannot be turned off.
Saved on this device only. Press Esc to close.